How to achieve proper overbitedLessons from natural dentoalveolar compensation

Please cite this article in press as: Ch Journal of Dental Sciences (2013), ht 1991-7902/$36 Copyrighta 2013, Assoc http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2013.0 Abstract Background/purpose: To identify how dentoalveolar changes compensate for proper overbite in extreme vertical facial patterns. Materials and methods: Lateral cephalometric roentgenograms of preorthodontic adult patients with hyperdivergent (nZ 49; SN-mandibular plane (MP) angle greater than 38 degrees) and hypodivergent (n Z 38; SN-MP angle less than 28 degrees) skeletal patterns were selected. Skeletalvertical (SV) variables were selected and summarized via stepwise regression methods and principal component analysis (PCA) in these two groups. Multiple regression analyses were performed to determine the relationship between overbite (OB) as the dependent variable and the PCA-derived SV, dental height (DH), and dental inclination (DI) as the independent variables. Results: Hyperdivergent patients have the tendency of anterior open bite. The natural dentoalveolar compensatory mechanism is manifested in shorter upper molar height and larger lower incisor height. Hypodivergent patients have no tendency of anterior deep bite. The shorter upper and lower incisor DHs and larger incisal inclination achieved dentoalveolar compensatory mechanism in these patients. Conclusion: For orthodontically closing the open bite, intruding upper posteriors and extruding lower anteriors are appropriate ways to simulate the natural occurring compensation. To eliminate deep bite in a lowmandibular plane patient, intruding upper and lower anteriors and proclining anteriors will achieve good overbite. Imitating the natural dentoalveolar compensation by